I would think: The USA is punishing us for rebelling. They are trying to stop us from rebelling. The USA wants the rebellion to stop. The USA wants them all to continue being non-rebellious slaves. That is what I see when I look at this. I don't see it as the USA 'helping' anybody who is rebelling. I see it as another form of suppression. If you were rebelling, and somebody started bombing you, wouldn't you think that they were trying to stop you from rebelling? If you look at all the land and buildings destroyed by the bombs, are you going to say, 'Thank you USA for helping us become free?' Or will you say, 'The USA tried to destroy us as soon as we started rebelling?'
I haven't been reading about this... I knew it from the very first instant that I read about rebellions and riots. I knew we would go attack them. I knew this was not a good thing. I knew exactly where this would go.
They are rebelling - or they were, at least, in the beginning - supposedly because of high prices and unemployment. You know who causes that, don't you? The USA and its banking system. The big countries and their fiat money. That is what causes worldwide high prices and unemployment. Don't you hear the USA and the Federal Reserve saying, 'We need to create inflation to save ourselves from a slow economy?' They talk about deliberately creating inflation. They talk about how inflation is supposed to be a good thing: Keynesian economics fallacies. They are creating higher prices deliberately.
When countries elsewhere start rioting and rebelling, what happens? The USA tells them: Shut up right now, or we will punish you. If the rebellions go to far, what happens? The USA goes and bombs them to shut them up. Are we supposedly fighting against Ghadafi? This is the same thing as it always is: Why don't they just go assassinate Ghadafi himself directly? Why don't they just bomb his house with him in it? This has nothing to do with 'helping them fight against Ghadafi.' This is the USA helping Ghadafi fight against the citizens. You don't understand? Is there some kind of sacred rule saying we can't just go assassinate Ghadafi, but it's okay to destroy hundreds of buildings and civilians? And the same thing with Saddam Hussein.
The USA has 'unique capabilities' for this fighting? I can't wait to see what those are. People start rebelling, and I guess we're probably going to build them some new 'infrastructure' quote unquote after the bombing is over. We'll rebuild it for them, but it will be newer and better than ever, and I'm sure this infrastructure will indeed be special and unique.
They are punishing the countries that are rebelling. Beware out there, whoever you are. If you are rioting, if you revolt, if you complain about high prices, the USA will destroy you, destroy you completely and without remorse. Don't let them make you believe any differently. Don't let them lie to you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment